• Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Visit nwea.org
Kingsbury Center
  • Our Research
    • About Our Research
    • Research Reports & Publications
    • Data Gallery
  • Working With Us
    • How We Partner
    • Project Features and Case Studies
    • Kingsbury Center Data Award
    • Data Award Recipients
    • FAQ - Data Award
  • Our Data
    • About Our Data
    • GRD™ Data
    • Virtual Comparison Groups
    • FAQ - Available Data
    • FAQ - Using the Data for Research
  • Our Team
    • Researchers Bios
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • News
    • Careers & Internships
  • Blog
      Home » Arkansas, Race, and School Choice

      Blog

      Arkansas, Race, and School Choice

      Posted by Nate Jensen
      June 12, 2012
      Email this page
      Tweet

      Prior to joining the Kingsbury Center, I spent several years working at the University of Arkansas as a researcher in the Office for Education Policy (OEP). Much of my/our work in the OEP was focused on relevant issues in education policy in both Arkansas and across the nation, with a specific emphasis on what impact these policies have on Arkansas students.

      I still try to keep up-to-date on issues impacting Arkansas, and I just became aware of a recent court ruling there that has some major implications for Arkansas’ students. I realize Arkansas education is probably not the most interesting to non-Arkansans, but I wanted to share this story anyways because I think it speaks to an issue that is relevant in education everywhere, not just in Hog Country.

      Last week, a federal judge overturned the school choice law in Arkansas, a law which used student race as the primary determinant for whether or not students could attend  schools other than their own (here is a recap of the story from the Washington Post). Essentially, students were allowed to transfer to other schools in other districts if the percentage of enrollment for the transferring student’s race in his or her new school did not exceed the percentage in the student’s resident district. In other words, if a white student wanted to transfer to a new school, he could only do so if the new school was not “whiter” than his previous school.

      The reason for this law is probably pretty apparent—desegregation in Arkansas was a pretty big concern in the middle of the 20th century (and still is today)—so this law was put into place to give students choices in education while limiting the risk or likelihood of “white flight” or increased segregation.

      The reason this law was overturned was because a white student was denied a transfer to a neighboring district which had a greater composition of white students than his previous district, and so the family of that student filed a suit claiming that race should not be the sole criterion used in the determination of whether these transfers are allowed. Well, the student and his family won the suit (race will no longer be a factor in decisions about student choice transfers), but instead of simply allowing this student to transfer, the courts simply got rid of the school choice law altogether. And, perhaps the most important outcome of this ruling is that approximately 15,000 students in Arkansas have taken advantage of this choice law, with their status now in limbo about how this ruling will impact them—specifically, whether they can continue to attend the school they chose to attend or if they have to return to their “home” district.

      I realize school choice is a polarizing topic, but I feel comfortable saying that I think students should have more open choices about where they want to go to school. However, this ruling feels in many ways like Arkansas is throwing the baby out with the bath water – instead of putting thought into an alternative framework that would allow students flexibility in school options while minimizing the risk of having completely segregated school environments, the courts instead decided to scrap the whole idea of choice altogether.

      I think diversity is extremely important for students; however, I also think families and students should be able to determine what they value most in an education environment. The decision in Arkansas will likely go a long way towards ensuring that the schools in Arkansas do not become more segregated than they already are. At the same time, this decision will also ensure that students are compelled to attend schools in their local district, regardless of whether or not these schools are actually meeting the students’ educational needs.

      Unfortunately, for the families that can afford to move, this won’t be an issue; they can move into the district of the schools they prefer. But for those families that can’t afford to seek out a better school for their children by relocating, this decision has simply taken away one of the few options these students have to attend the school that is best for them and their education.  

      Comment
      Close
      Post A Comment:
      Incorrect please try again
      * Enter the words above * Enter the numbers you hear
      Get another CAPTCHA
      Get an audio CAPTCHA
      Get an image CAPTCHA
      Help

      Show Posts:

      Most Recent Posts:

      Data Question of the Month! Using NWEA Norms to Establish Goals on State Tests
      Mike Dahlin
      May 14, 2013

      401 Pre-K? Investing in early-childhood education
      Beth Tarasawa
      May 8, 2013

      Aligning the MAP Assessment to Content Standards
      Andy Hegedus
      April 22, 2013

      Inviting a Lawsuit? – Evaluating art teachers on the school reading results
      John Cronin
      April 17, 2013

      Blogs We Read

      The Education Gadfly Daily
      Top Ten Takeaways: Common Assessments (Part 1 of 2)The Quick and the Ed
      Quick Hits (5.23.13)Eduwonk
      Boston Charters & NCLB AccountabilityInside School Research - Education Week
      Education Department Launches Overhauled Education DigestRick Hess Straight Up
      Common Core & the High-Stakes "Hiatus"Education Experts
      New Definition of Asperger's, Autism for Kids
      Subscribe to Site Feed
      Editorial Policy & Term of Use
      Contact Us | Term of Use | Visit nwea.org